paper abstract:

in 1998, developmental work and research began on provision of web-based virtual learning materials at swinburne university of technology, lilydale. two events (first - the decision to provide printed learning guides, and second - the arrival of the information technology, systems and multimedia discipline leader) acted as catalytic agents for development of these virtual learning materials and consequent, action research for the case under study.

the virtual learning materials research project required grounding in at least one of the instructional theories. the research to date indicates that it is important to be as comprehensive as possible in terms of instructional strategies, in particular gaining the learner's attention, presenting of objectives and stimulating recall of knowledge both learned and previously acquired. petry et al (petry, mouton and reigeluth, 1987) has in part provided a synopsis of selected theories and models of instructional theory that are drawn upon at this time. however, instructional strategies only form one facet of the formative questions. the second is learner motivation. here, the research draws upon the work of keller et al who has explicitly addressed the use of motivational strategies, (cf keller and kopp, 1987;).

this paper is constituted as a series of questions emanating from a reflective action research approach to the operation of, or socialisation of, individuals and groups acting as agents within an australian regional university campus setting. the campus setting in essence provides boundaries, or constrains certain variables, within which to observe actors. for example the campus would be considered small with only 1500 - 1800 students and staffing of about 30 academics for some twelve discipline areas.

significant to the researcher/author, in the present research, is the investigation and implementation of learner-centric computer-mediated online studies and also the reflexive monitoring of operationalised research and developments. this can be more specifically portrayed as:

· subject delivery, using computer-mediated learning (cml),
· development of a virtual learning guide template (vlgt);
· investigation of first year student reactions to cml and virtual learning materials;
· investigation of learner motivation and the apparent performance goal orientation of students in the case study;
· operationalising research outcomes, and the reflexive monitoring and measurement of implementations.

theme learning and teaching online: sub-theme b – curriculum design, online learning and teaching modes, and best practice; and evaluation of online learning and teaching.

background:

within the development work of a computer-mediated and web-based virtual learning guide template (vlgt) is the need for an understanding of the axiomatic position of the swinburne university of technology, lilydale (sutl campus), as that position acts to constrain a number of learning systems variables.

in the early 1990’s a campus decision was made by the academic staff that every subject taught at the campus must have a learning guide in printed form and available for sale at cost to all students. the guides were to contain the substantive content of the subject being taught, and to express the learning objectives inherent in that study. as the learning materials specification (paterson & weal, 1995) states:

“learning guides are the vehicle for communicating learning expectations and learning modes. they map the route that your students should follow in order to complete their studies successfully.”

the learning guide model has been operational since 1994. the implementation of these guides and observations by the researcher have led to several broad questions (outlined below) that require research in order to more fully understand the ramifications and outcomes. before asking the questions, its is important to state the axiomatic position of the academics concerned, with the learning materials specification and the extant structure of the learning guide in mind. firstly, there is the philosophical position of constructivism as would be expressed by jonassen et al. secondly, structural requirements were that flexible and multi-modal instruction modes support the student, it should also be noted that it was not a requirement for academics to offer online learning materials as one such mode.

the structure of the extant learning guide is divided into three parts:

1. subject level components

content list
introduction
overview
review
final assessment
conclusion

2. module level components

content list
introduction
objectives
assessment
summary
self-assessment questions
self-assessment answers
further reading
3. topic level components

introduction
objectives
learning modes and
resources
main text
summary
bibliography

each subject consists of a number of modules, with each module consisting of one or more topics. to date no follow-up research or evaluation has transpired in a systematic way to investigate the veracity of the model as a learning framework or a subject delivery tool; other than to note that students are progressing at rates similar to others at the city campus of the university.

in 1998, several events transpired whereby a significant number of subjects required revision and/or replacing within the information technology, systems and multimedia discipline (itsm discipline). there was no time available to write the learning materials and have them published (for purchase by students) prior to the start of the teaching semesters. as the discipline leader and subsequently also the researcher, i decided to design and implement a web-based computer-mediated learning materials template similar to the print version. this meant that academics undertook a progressive publication approach to subject development. initially, all the itsm discipline academics were able to achieve was an online version of the content and learning objectives, on a week-by-week basis, available to students both via internet connection and also via campus computer access labs.

observations and questions:

in many aspects, the very axioms of the academics at the sutl campus have fallen prey to the pragmatic of student demands for content and assessment targets, and the structure of conversional instruction week-by-week as face-to-face teaching.

several observations emanate, as one who has used this system:

· emphasis on learning objectives (paterson & weal, 1995) – however, students take little notice of these objectives;
· explicit content – expressing important ideas, readings and self-assessment requiring considerable development by the academic and no development by the student;
· a 1999 quality review indicates that very few of the learning guides published, display the degree of completeness, implicit, in the learning materials specification;
· students at undergraduate level display behaviour similar to that expected in a performance based or goal oriented learning mode, and a reluctance to undertake cognitive and reflexive learning;
· a reluctance by academics to make use of online delivery as an alternative flexible mode or instructional technology.

several broad questions emanate. questions that help focus the wider research, in part reported in this paper. they are:

· what needs to change in the learning guide model in order to activate self-directed learning by the undergraduate students?
· can online computer-mediated learning provide a “significant (non-detrimental) difference” for students choosing this mode of study?
· can online computer-mediated learning be developed to a stage where students choose self-directed learning over conventional instruction?

the flexibility offered to academics and the students via online and computer-mediated learning materials was made obvious by the immediate and positive response to the initiative. during the past two years several evaluations have been conducted by the researcher in order to test the efficacy of this first step toward online self-directed learning materials. the results have indicated that students will make use of online materials of similar or better quality in preference to purchasing published learning guides. it is important to determine, however, whether this is just a novelty reaction on the part of academics and students. also, is it a response by academics to reduce pressure that might result with a just-in-time development attitude? or a response by students to reduce costs and take up paid employment while studying? will the online learning materials suffer the same fate of the equivalent printed learning materials?

all these questions and observations are being addressed through a program of research extending over several years. the research was formalised in the learning edge project by the researcher, and over the past two years has seen the implementation of several research projects focused on specific elements of a computer-mediated learning environment. the latest sub-project, and the focus of this paper, is the conceptualising of a virtual learning guide template that expresses both the current theories and thinking, and answers the self-directed learning enigma expressed earlier.

virtual learning guide template (vlgt):

while the learning edge project is investigating nominated variables within the itsm discipline computer-mediated learning materials, there is a second aspect, a conceptualising of a virtual learning guide template or model that encapsulates the following aspirations:

· an open, flexible learning environment conducive to self-directed learning;
· an adaptive learning and instruction mode, online and supported by etutors.

such a position assumes at a minimum that learning will be computer-mediated, however, where possible face-to-face tutoring should also be available thus maintaining multi-modal subject delivery. rowntree (1990) suggests that such aspirations depend upon materials specifically written and/or modified with specific outcomes in mind. this poses significant questions in and of itself without considering the wider conceptual and structural implications.