论文网首页|会计论文|管理论文|计算机论文|医药学|经济学论文|法学论文|社会学论文|文学论文|教育论文|理学论文|工学论文|艺术论文|哲学论文|文化论文|外语论文|论文格式
中国论文网

用户注册

设为首页

您现在的位置: 中国论文网 >> 外语论文 >> 其他相关论文 >> 正文 会员中心
 外语翻译论文   语言文化论文   英美文学论文   其他相关论文   学术英语   商务英语   英语教学
“THE WOLF AT THE DOOR”:HOLLYWOOD AND THE FILM MARKET IN CHINA FROM 1994-2000(一)

stanley rosen

  department of political science university of southern california los angeles,clifornia 90089-0044e-mail :[email protected]

  prologue

  "'if only 1%of the people go and you only charge one-fiftieth of the admissionthat you'd charge here,you still get to some pretty big numbers ,'said logsdon,who estimated that hollywood would reap tens of millions of dollars from a moreopen chinese market early on."(entertainment analyst jeffrey logsdon of seidlercos.in los angeles ,in alan citron and claudia eller ,"hollywood moves to colonizechina ,"los angeles times ,april 26,1994,p.d4)。

  "who knows if they will enforce it?the way things work over there ,negotiationsare incredibly protracted.they could not cooperate with you and you wouldn't evenknow it."(a studio official at mgm who spoke on condition of anonymity on hisreaction to a chinese ban on cooperation with three hollywood studios.the ban stemmedfrom a memo from china's ministry of radio,film and television that singled out"seven years in tibet"(columbia tristar),"kundun"(disney)and "red corner"(mgm/united artists)as films that "viciously attack china [and]hurt chinesepeople's feelings."(sharon waxman ,"china bans work with film studios ,"thewashington post ,november 1,1997,p.c1)。www.11665.cOm

  the quotations above neatly encapsulate the hopes ,uncertainties and disappointmentsof the hollywood studios in their dealings with china.the market beckons ,asalways,but the chinese government's "interference"in the market,often seenas arbitrary if not "inscrutable,"continues to prevent hollywood from "reaping"the profits logsdon predicted.

  introduction

  by the early 1990s the chinese film industry was facing a serious crisis.accordingto one source ,attendance at chinese theaters had dropped from 21billion in 1982to just under 4.5billion in 1991.(1)compounding the problem,new entertainmentoptions began to flower following deng xiaoping's "southern tour"in early 1992.karaoke bars,discos ,video parlors,pirated videos ,and other previouslyrestricted forms of leisure were providing intense competition to chinese cinemas.(2)desperate for a solution to the problem,yet unwilling and unable to relaxideological restrictions forbidding the sure-fire western formulas of sex and violence,the authorities introduced a series of limited measures in 1992.zhang yimou's films"judou"and "raise the red lantern"had their bans lifted.a large-scale film festivalheld in changchun awarded zhang's new film,"the story of qiu ju ,"its highestaward ,and leading party officials,to show their support,arranged a well-publicizedpreview in the great hall of the people.(3)

  it was only after the 14th communist party congress in october 1992,however,that a number of "capitalist-style"reforms aimed at decentralizing the marketingand distribution of films were introduced in an effort to revive the film industry.key central documents issued in 1993(document no.3)and 1994(document no.348)are considered the start of the structural reform of the chinese film industry.although the new regulations provided no panacea and many problems still remained,these documents began to break the distribution monopoly of the china film corporation,allowing chinese film studios to distribute their films through local units.(4)

  as the audience for mainland films was falling dramatically ,hong kong videosand laserdiscs began to flood the market.with inflation running as high as 20percentin the major cities in 1992-93,and state support less and less forthcoming,china'sfilm professionals were compelled to adopt new strategies -for example to lookabroad for finance,to attract co-productions financed through hong kong ,orto produce and direct television series -in an effort to survive.indeed ,asone informed observer noted ,the larger studios in beijing and shanghai were survivingonly by turning themselves into service centers for productions financed from hongkong or taiwan.(5)in his yearly summary for variety derek elley noted thatdomestic film production fell in 1993by 50percent (in terms of movies screened);attendances fell by 60percent;box office grosses fell by 35percent;andrentals fell by 40percent.(6)the chinese film market -from production toexhibition -was "in desperate need of major long-term investment".(7)

  hollywood's time had finally come.years of discussions had always met withfirm chinese resistance to go beyond a willingness to accept a small number of hollywoodfilms each year for a flat fee of $30,000-$50,000per film.(8)in the new,market-driven environment ,however,the china film export and import corporation,which controls all imports,announced that china would release ten "excellent"foreign films a year,on a revenue-sharing basis.even xinhua,the official governmentnews agency ,gushed that "an end is in sight to the 40-year-old tradition of buyingout-dated and low-grade but cheap foreign movies."(9)this chapter examines hollywood'srelationship with china from the first imported "megaproduction"(dapian)-"thefugitive"-which opened in beijing on november 12,1994until late summer 2000.over the course of almost six years and 46imported american films,the relationshiphas ebbed and flowed,with alternating periods of optimism and pessimism on eachside.in the complex account to follow,however,several conclusions will be documented.first ,despite the obvious problems that have marked and continue to affect therelationship,hollywood and the chinese film industry will remain locked in anuneasy embrace.by all indications,they appear to need each other.second ,hollywoodwas invited in at a time when the chinese film industry was facing a dire crisis;questions were being raised about its very survival.by summer 2000,with china'simminent entrance to the world trade organization (wto )on the horizon ,thechinese media were raising similar questions about the survival of the chinese filmindustry.one well-known director entitled his article on the future of chinesefilm,"to be or not to be?"(10)

  third ,and perhaps inevitably ,the relationship might well be describedby the familiar chinese idiom ,tongchuang yimeng(same bed,different dreams )。hollywood's long-term aspirations for its initiatives in china are clearly verydifferent from china's expectations.indeed ,one could persuasively argue thathollywood's dreams are china's fears.but while hollywood's intentions may be frighteningto chinese authorities,since there is a reasonable possibility that they couldsucceed ,china's intentions -the most important of which is to have a reciprocalrelationship under which chinese films are distributed in significant numbers inthe united states -is a clear non-starter.fourth,the debate on how to save thechinese film industry is a fascinating one,contrasting a variety of strategiessuggested and implemented by some of china's leading directors and producers.akey issue in this debate is the role of the chinese government,with some participantsarguing that the film industry cannot survive in the absence of government protection,and others suggesting that government intervention in the film industry is preciselythe problem.

  related to this ,and most fundamentally ,the move toward a market economyhas confronted the chinese government with a serious dilemma and a basic contradiction.moreover,this dilemma has consistently revealed the familiar division betweenfilm bureaucrats and film professionals.since the reforms began there has beenan on-going tension between two often-contradictory goals.on the one hand thereis the need to "administer"film production to ensure the release of politicallydesirable films ,what the chinese call "main melody films"(zhu xuanlu)。onthe other hand,there is the need to release films that can succeed in the market.(11)hollywood films have been successful in china because of their entertainmentvalue.for chinese films to compete successfully they will also have to providean acceptable level of entertainment.yet ,as an important recent circular jointlyissued by the state administration of radio ,film and television and the ministryof culture made very clear,the "basic task of the film industry"remains buildinga "socialist spiritual civilization".it must be ensured that "social benefits aregiven primary consideration"over "economic results."(12)thus ,film professionalsare likely to continue to be constrained in their ability to compete for chineseaudiences.faced with the new specter of wto,their frustration appears particularlyacute.(13)

  hollywood in china,the early years:1994-1995

  the opening of "the fugitive"(wangming tianya ,or "fleeing to the ends ofthe earth"in chinese )on november 12,1994in six chinese cities was hailedin both the western and chinese press as "an event of historic significance"anda great box office success.(14)equally important for our purposes ,many ofthe problems and contradictions that have plagued the film market in china can beseen in embryo form during the "run"of "the fugitive".these include the conflictbetween economics and ideology,the issue of intellectual piracy ,and the struggleamong bureaucratic agencies to control the profits of hollywood productions.

  within a week of the film's opening to packed houses the movie was suddenlywithdrawn in beijing with various official and unofficial explanations offered.the official china business times reported that the film was withdrawn because somefilm industry officials believed it would allow foreign distributors to "invade"china's movie market.(15)other sources reported ,more precisely ,that theproblem stemmed from a struggle between the beijing film distribution company andthe china film import and export corporation over the rights to proceeds from thefilm.china film had booked the movie directly with beijing theaters,bypassingthe local distributor.when the local beijing distributor lost the battle it tookthe matter to its parent unit ,the city's cultural bureau ,and to the centralpropaganda department ,claiming that the film violated chinese political mores,that in fact showing the film was the equivalent of "using socialist money to fattenthe capitalist pig."(16)in fact,throughout june and july 1994the chinese pressdebated the impact of the importation of ten blockbuster hollywood films on thechinese film industry and on chinese society more generally ,with various filmindustry professionals suggesting the advantages and disadvantages of this decision.

  the more immediate matter of "the fugitive"was resolved when the film bureauwithin the ministry of radio,television and broadcasting issued document no.348(mentioned above ),to take effect on january 1,1995,allowing the authorizeddistributor to deal directly with chinese cinemas ,thereby opening up the distributionmarket.(17)by mid-january 1995"the fugitive"had reopened in beijing with muchfanfare in the local press.(18)

  such blatant ideological appeals in defense of socialism against the encroachmentof western capitalist products were soon to be limited primarily to the remnantleftist media.while a considerable number of american movies were indeed vetoedby china film -or more often not even submitted by the studios because of the likelihoodof a veto -once a film was accepted the main concern became box office receipts.however ,politics has always been a factor in the relationship.the success ofthe studios in gaining approval for their films and even the assessment of the filmsin the chinese media has been dependent on a studio's "sincerity"toward china and,in extraordinary circumstances,on the larger issue of sino-american relations.the most obvious examples ,to be discussed below,are the bans on columbia tristar,mgm ,and disney for their american films with chinese themes in 1997,the debateover disney's "mulan,"and the total ban on american films following the bombingof the chinese embassy in belgrade in may 1999.

  "the fugitive"was also plagued by the now-familiar problem of intellectualpiracy.copyright violations of american films and music recordings had been anissue in sino-american relations even before warner brothers had reached an agreementfor chinese cinemas to show "the fugitive".according to industry estimates ,chinesetheft of copyrighted products such as films and compact disks totaled around $800million annually.the motion picture association of america (mpa )and the recordindustry had been pushing the clinton administration to slap china with a "special301"designation,thereby branding it as a blatant intellectual property abuser.such a designation might then result in quick retaliation against chinese goodsentering the united states.however ,as the administration was reviewing the then-annualdecision on china's "most-favored-nation"status in 1994,the decision was madeto extend the deadline from april 30to june 30,in an effort to reach a solutionwith the chinese government.it was a process that would be repeated often in subsequentyears.(19)

  hollywood took heart,however,in june when u.s.trade representative mickeykantor put china on the super 301watch list of countries suspected of toleratingtheft of intellectual property,effectively giving it six months to enforce copyright.this was followed by a landmark decision by a chinese court in favor of a copyrightinfringement suit filed by the walt disney company against a publisher of children'sbooks.the publisher was found guilty of illegally publishing and distributing booksbased on disney animated films featuring such characters as mickey mouse,cinderella,peter pan and snow white.(20)
  the chinese government,however,ironically soon found itself identifyingwith dr.richard kimble ,the protagonist of "the fugitive ,"when it was accusedof permitting at least three state-run cable television stations in southern chinato broadcast the film.in addition,it was clear that the pirated videos beingshown derived from one of 29chinese factories known to be producing illegal copiesof american products,ranging from corn flakes to blockbuster films.china filmdenied authorizing duplication,distribution or broadcast rights of "the fugitive"to any company or individual.suggesting that intellectual property rights werenew to china and some cable operators may not have been aware they were breakingthe law ,china film -the state import monopoly -issued a notice in renmin ribaocalling for tough action against the chinese bootleggers.(21)but the damagehad been done.as successful as it was,pulling in 25.8million yuan at the boxoffice,"the fugitive"was far less successful than it would have been had it notbeen withdrawn from beijing theaters in november and had it not been widely piratedand shown on chinese cable television.it remained for the second american film ,"true lies,"starring arnold schwarzenegger,to fulfill the promise suggestedby "the fugitive".

  by november 1994hong kong's golden harvest entertainment had signed a dealto release the first hong kong film in china,also on a revenue-sharing basis.jackie chan's "drunken master ii"was chosen with a release date set for december10.equally significant ,golden harvest announced that jackie chan's "rumble inthe bronx"would be released simultaneously in mainland china ,hong kong and taiwanduring the spring festival(chinese new year)1995,in an effort to minimizepiracy and maximize the box office.(22)the stage was set for hong kong and hollywoodto compete for the potentially lucrative china market.

  having learned the lessons of "the fugitive ,"chinese authorities went togreat efforts to support the first imported megaproductions of 1995,"rumble inthe bronx"and "true lies".each was overwhelmingly successful and thus contributedgreatly to a revival of the chinese film market.the success of these films alsotriggered a renewed debate in the film industry about protecting national cinema,one that continues today as china prepares to join the wto.the impact of "rumblein the bronx,"particularly in guangzhou (canton),can hardly be overestimated.this was the first time that jackie chan fans -and they are legion in china -couldsee their favorite hero on the big screen rather than on the blurred monitors ofvideo parlors.box office receipts during the two-week run in guangzhou amountedto three million yuan ,far surpassing those gained from the rampantly pirated"fugitive ,"and breaking all box office records up to that time.in beijing aswell,now seemingly free of bureaucratic squabbles ,a new and carefully plannedmarketing strategy was employed and "rumble in the bronx"brought in 5.16millionyuan during the spring festival.(23)

  • 上一篇外语论文:
  • 下一篇外语论文:
  •  作者:未知 [标签: ]
    姓 名: *
    E-mail:
    评 分: 1分 2分 3分 4分 5分
    评论内容:
    发表评论请遵守中国各项有关法律法规,评论内容只代表网友个人观点,与本网站立场无关。
    As is the case的用法分析
    Under the Dome穹顶之下
    As it happens的语义与用法分析
    The Power of Music
    The Circus
    Part 3 Eye on the Prize
    Tavi Gevinson: the Fashion Blogger Beco…
    The Lives of a Cell《细胞生命的礼赞》——…
    Who Is the Wisest of All? 谁是最有智慧的…
    The Sparrow & the Hawk麻雀与老鹰
    Strange Things Banned by Governments各国…
    Famous Left—Handed Authors著名的左撇子作…
    | 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 联系我们 | 网站地图 | 手机版 | 论文发表

    Copyright 2006-2013 © 毕业论文网 All rights reserved 

     [中国免费论文网]  版权所有